Executives must become Socially Intelligent

A line in an article I read recently  stood out in neon:  Even an executive never sends a tweet or posts a status update, they must know what social media is and what it means for their business.

2011 was a breakthrough year for social media.  There was so much hype and hyperbole that many businesses rushed to put up Facebook pages and open Twitter accounts only to be faced with the very real question of “Now what?”.  Others still immediately blasted out their advertising messages only to be met with derision and ghost town followings.

2012 will be the year of social intelligence as I outlined in this blog article.

This article referred to being savvy to the multitude of conversations taking place moment to moment about your brand, industry and competitors.  But this will also extend to executives at senior level being intelligent about social.

Know what it is, know how it works, know what it is doing to your business. Even if an exec is not personally active (but seriously, the time is now) he or she cannot be ignorant about how it is evolving and how this evolution with affect their business.

And the greater the smarts at the top, the greater chance there is of those smarts translating to every level of the organisation.

It all comes back to the mantra of social business:  Be Smart, Be Engaged.  Be Human.

 

Why you Must use your Friends Lists on Facebook (and how to do it)

Use your Facebook lists!

As our use of Facebook evolves we are building up “friends”  in very different areas of our lives.  We have our close family, our not so close family, close friends, business associates, work colleagues and on and on.  Each plays a specific role in our lives and what we do.

And as these friends grow it becomes important to deliver the right messages to the right people. By not paying attention to this you may be offending or upsetting groups of friends or you might be getting blocked by people that you may later want to engage.

Say you’ve had a particularly bad day and want to vent a little.  No problem, but let those closest to you know about it and not your business colleagues.

If you want to talk business make those updates available to your business network (and it is quite possible you have friends for different areas of business).

In this way you are talking to the right people about what is most real to them. Our personal and work lives have become blurred, as I wrote about here but the fact is that your poker friends may not want to know about the goings on at work and your important business contacts may not need to know about your family get together.  When you are talking to all your friends about what they care about, your network will increase in value.

Ok, great so how do you do it?

First you need to assign all your FB friends to lists. This is the hard part and may take some time if you’ve never done it.  But once done, maintaining it is pretty simple.  Every time you send a friend request you are able to add the person to a list right away.  The same thing when you accept a request. How do you edit your lists?

On your profile on the left hand side you’ll see a heading “LISTS”.  Click on this and you’ll be able to create lists and add friends to lists.

Now, every time you write a status update you have the option to select who sees it:

Click the button next to “post” and click the list you want to include in your update.  Now only those friends will be able to see that post.

IMPORTANT:  Facebook will save your last selection and assume it for your next update, so remember to change it as needed.

Using lists will take a long way in building an even better network.

 

Google+ in South Africa: Who will build it? Brands or Consumers?

From the look of things the South African landscape on Google+ is still more tumbleweeds than anything else.

Brand pages on Google+ are gaining traction in the USA and elsewhere but South Africa doesn’t seem to have taken to it, yet. Traditional social tracking websites like SocialBakers don’t even list SA stats.

I did some quick, not very scientific, analyses of South African brands on Google+ and it’s pretty sorry.  On the plus side there are  a high number of Brand Pages but they’re all struggling along with little following and engagement.  I couldn’t find a brand page that had more than 271 followers (SA Tourism).

Interestingly the big name brands that are successful on Twitter and Facebook like Woolworths, Huisgenoot, Vodacom and Springleap have very little going on on Google+ with each having less than 100 followers (perhaps the better phrasing is they have been circled by less than 100).

The same goes for individuals that have a high profile on other social networks like Gareth Cliff and DJ Euphonik.

In July last year I wrote a review on Google+ and asked the question: Is the social web big enough for Facebook AND Google+.  The above tells me that,  in South Africa at this time, it is not.

The South African Facebook population is just touching 5 million.  This number represents 91% of online South Africans.  This high penetration rate will continue as more of our people get online (which they most certainly will).  Facebook is by far the king of social networks here. We all know someone that said they have no interest in Facebook and they will never use it.  Now they’re updating statuses with the best of them.  Through shear weight of time and pressure the platform has an unshakable hold.

The question for the average user then is “what will I get from Google+ that I’m not getting on Facebook?”.  The answer right now is nothing.

This is not to say that Google+ is no good.  Quite the contrary, I believe there are fantastic opportunities for individuals and brands to have deeper and more meaningful engagement with innovations like Hangout.  But this is all for naught if noone is there.

However, with the backing of the Google monolith and the importance that Google+ will play in search the platform will grow and become more and more important.  But it’s going to take time and plenty of it. Just yesterday Google announced that searches on Google will include results from your circles on Google+.  No doubt this will become more and more important and may be the trigger to get more people using it.  Chicken or the egg? Will brands bring the consumers or will the consumers bring the brands? From a brand perspective it wouldn’t be a bad idea to be there when the hoards arrive.

Are you on Google+? What would make you sign up or use it more?

Social in 2012: Intelligence & Integration

2011 was the year that social media went viral in South Africa: The number of “experts” in the field mushroomed, there were seminars, talks and a scramble for business.  Out of the confusion came one, unassailable fact:  Business must go social.

In 2012 the international trend will be Social Intelligence with an emphasis on knowledge, intelligence about your business, industry and competitors.  This is and always has been the first step in developing a social media programme that is sustainable. Monitoring the social web and knowing what is being said about you, your industry and your competition.

And through this intelligence, real and effective social strategies will evolve.  The greatest effect of this will be seen in the office environment with the introduction of social platforms as part of every day workflow, much like email is used now.

Dell had great foresight in this regard.  Already in 2010 they put 5000 employees through social media university.

2012 will see social begin to dominate as communication platforms for business. We may even see email numbers go down for the first time since 1994.  At 260 billion emails a day, who can stand to get any more?

This will require a re-engineering of communication systems and training at all levels, including the C-suite (more accurately, especially the C-suite).

We will see marketing departments no longer being the sole custodians of social communication.  To be sure they will continue to be key players but for a business to go social every employee in every department must know and make use of it.  Only the most backward and resistant will still block & ban social access in the workplace.

It’s going to be a dynamic world in 2012.

The Last Advertisement Standing

Nandos most recent triumph, their “Last Dictator Standing” is indeed a triumph.

When I first saw it last Friday I was quite literally gobsmacked.  A stroke of genius.  I couldn’t stop watching it.  I instantly annoyed several friends and colleagues, insisting they stop what they are doing and watch.  And I would watch it with them.

I posted the following status update on Facebook: For my money the Nandos Last Dictator ad is a stroke of genius that is difficult to comprehend. Truly amazing.

I shortly received a comment asking “Why do you feel that, Ryan?” That sort of stopped me dead.  Why do I feel that?

Firstly, taking a non personal look at it, there was clearly something right about it, since it went viral quite rapidly and was on You Tube’s front page by the end of the day.

But getting into a bit more of a personal analysis: Advertising, as we have known it, has left us.  I cringe at the stupid and ridiculous efforts on radio and TV to keep us buying.  More and more, we consumers, if we are to be advertised to, want to be entertained. We want to make a connection and somehow we want to be moved.  Does this help sell more product? I sincerely hope so as that is the only way we will continue see things as amazing as this ad.

In the space of one minute I was taken back to my own “those days”, the innocent fun of playing with friends that were important to me.  But then I’m struck by the  pure ridiculousness of dictators enjoying such innocence which brings home the seriousness of the harm and destruction wrought by the regimes they created.  However all but one of those depicted have fallen which reminds me that there is hope in the relentless progression of the human race.  Perhaps we are, indeed, going to overcome.  And not to mention it was just plain, hilarious fun.

Most remarkable is how such a message can go global in 24-48 hours with the campaign receiving coverage by the Huffington Post and TIME and many others.

Is advertising dead? Not when it’s like this.  I might even get a meal for 6.

Are your kids disconnected from reality in an “always connected” society?

A question I’m sometimes asked, particularly by people who are more old school, is: “Don’t you think we are losing something in society when our kids are interacting with their friends and networks through a phone or a gadget rather than in person, direct contact?”

There is a genuine concern about this, that perhaps we are getting so digitized that we are somehow losing a sense of real, human contact.  I can understand this view.  The age of the communication revolution is so different to the one just a  generation earlier.   So much so that it can be terribly difficult to comprehend this “always connected” society.

My answer to this questions is simply this:  It is part of our inherent intelligence that, as children and young adults, we will make the best use of the environment and tools available to us.

Firstly, for the most part our kids get plenty of human contact.  They go to school or university and they have a network of friends with whom they interact.  A good percentage play sport or are part of academic or other social groups.

But given the amazing technological platform that exists today, those networks and the interaction with them extends far beyond their physical contact.  A conversation can be started on the way to school in the morning through BBM, continue in person at school, move between physical and digital during school and finally come to a conclusion through an evening interaction on Facebook.

I would argue that people are far more social today and connected to the world because of the technology they favour.  And being young means they are able to master technology very quickly.

My son, who is now 19, has had a cell phone since he was 8 years old.  He has grown up in a world in which he accepts being connected as the default human condition and I am often amazed at the richness and depth of his network.

I can scarcely imagine the world he will pass on to my grand kids.

Our Emotional Attachment to Gadgets has Changed the Way we Behave

I’ve just finished reading this article about how Tablet devices are changing the future of search.  When I saw the headline I sniggered to myself.  Oh come on, search is search. Type in your query, get your answer.  But as I read through I thought about how my habits have changed since I got my Samsung Galaxy in August this year.  And it’s quite astonishing.

The first startling realisation is that you cannot just borrow someone else’s electronic device anymore.  pretty much starting with the iPod mass produced devices have become deeply personal and customisable.  In the 80s, if you were going on a plane ride you could use your buddy’s walkman and just lug along your own tapes.  With an iPod it’s not so easy.  Firstly you have to hope your buddy has similar music tastes or load your own music on it.  A ridiculous scenario since most of us longer need an iPod, we have all the music we want on our phones or tablets.

A mobile phone has become so much more than a phone that calling it a phone is like referring to your car as a wheelie chair. In the 90s you could keep about 150 phone numbers and half names on your sim card (anyone remember the 12 character limit for a name?).  There was no on-phone storage.  Now these devices have almost unlimited capacity for your address book.  But it also knows your favourite websites, your games, your music, your email, your whatsapp, bbm and other messages.  It’s also becoming your wallet.  In fact an hour with someones phone and you get some deep insight into their lives, kinda like a diary with multi-media content.

Even more so with a tablet device.  It “knows” you. So much so that using someone else’s is decidedly uncomfortable.

Because of this the way we search has changed.  We’re moving from search to discovery. Using the device means we discover what is important to us rather than simply searching for it.  This has been referred to (or at least is in the article I reference) as “unified search” which is combining your senses for search.  Where are you? (think about search using your location through GPS).  What are you looking at (think about search using your front or back facing cameras). Not just with search either.  As our devices become more sophisticated so the unified experience becomes more seamless. We search a subject through which we find a location and either make a call to it, navigate to it or watch videos about it.  Whatever.  No cutting & pasting, remembering numbers.  One action moves fluidly to the next.

This could all fit neatly under the 2010 buzzword of “convergence”.  With each such convergence our world and the way we interact with it changes some more.

How have personalised, customised devices changed your habits or behaviours?

 

Being Connected is as Important as Having Electricity

I attended the MyBroadband 2001 conference today at Vodaworld.

There were some incredible data that came out of this.  Some of the more impressive numbers:

There are currently 4 billion connected devices in the world.  This will reach 15 billion by 2015 and 50 billion by 2020.  Staggering

Vodacom has spoken about a minority of people that have figured out how to abuse the Blackberry Internet Service.  The record for abuse is someone who downloaded 342 gigs of data in a month through the service (not bad for R59).

In two years Vodacom CEO Pieter Uys predicts that every phone sold will be a smartphone.

In 2010 the amount of internet traffic recorded was greater than all data since the beginning of the internet.  An impressive 245 exabytes, or 245 billion gigabytes.

But hands down the best presentation of the day was by Lars Reichelt, the former CEO of Cell-C.  He painted a picture for the future of connectivity or what I like to call the Communication Revolution. And it is truly remarkable.  By 2020 it will be almost impossible to function without being connected.  Quoting from Intel, the vision of the future is if something consumes electricity it will compute and if it computes it will be connected to the internet.  Thus being connected is as important as electricity. But from a South African perspective we must face some hard facts.

We cannot ignore the 40% of our population who do not live in urban centres.  Those in the countryside cannot be left to wallow with no electricity and thirsting in the digital wilderness.  With connectivity comes a world of education we could scarcely imagine.  Lars quite rightly trumpets the point that education is the key to any kind of future success for South Africa.

One point in particular that struck a cord with me is the possibility of placing powerful technology in the hands of our kids.  Tablet computers were all theory until the end of 2009 when the iPad arrived and changed everything.  Amazon launched the Kindle Fire, a $199 tablet.  India have now produced a $60 tablet that runs on Android.  A functional tablet.  At $60, or R500, you can put the power of Android in the hands of a student.  Imagine the possibilities for education with all texts required pre-loaded in addition to a world of video and other educational tools freely available in a connected world.  It would radically change the future of our country.  Nothing else can have that much impact for just R500 a head.

For just 1.5% of our defense budget (defending a country with no actual enemies) we could accomplish the technological quantum leap in our education of having a tablet in the hands of all 12 million children in our country.

Yes, of course I realise this is simplistic and a lot more money would have to be spent in distribution, training and infrastructure.  But the point IS simplistic.  This is not an unrealistic Utopian dream.  It is a tantalisingly reachable goal.

And certainly one I would like to be involved in.

When I tweeted this concept I got a bit of flack so I’d love to have your thoughts.  Let me know in the comments.

Can your Business Afford to Waste Time on Social Media?

By far the most frequent refrain from business people when I talk to them about going social is “I just don’t have the time.”  The implication in this statement of course is “who has time to wade through the drivel that people post on Facebook”.  And fair enough.

The simple answer to the conundrum of time and social media is this:  A business will spend time on anything in direct proportion to its return of value.  Of course you’re not going spend time on anything that isn’t growing or helping your business.  A solid and obvious policy.

Having said that though if you’re not getting a measurable return from your time on social media then simply the time you’re putting in is being misappropriated. When the time you put in is focused toward a stated goal you know if you’ve made progress or not.  Otherwise it’s quite easy to lose an hour and then wonder where on earth you’ve been.

All this comes down to planning.  Know before you go.  What do you want social media to do for your business?  What has to be achieved for your programme to be considered a success? Who are you trying to communicate to?  Answer these questions and then spend your time efficiently taking strides in the direction of the answers.

When you see the results it will justify investing further resources and over time you will build a healthy community that contributes bountifully to your bottom line.  Remember, you don’t make money from social media.  You make money from people who use social media.

Let me know your thoughts on this in the comments.

 

Facebook Doesn’t Care about your Resistance to Change

In the last 10 days Facebook has made numerous changes to the Facebook experience for users.  The most radical of these is coming in the next few days: A complete overhaul of the profile page which is being renamed “timeline”.

I’ve had the opportunity to play with the timeline and it is quite remarkable and I believe it will enrich the social experience and further integrate our online and offline lives in that what we do offline will be more and more reflected online.

The amount of resistance to these changes has been amazing to see.  Mashable ran a poll asking if users loved, hated or didn’t care about the changes.  With over 5 thousand votes 72% said they hated the changes, 14% loved them and 14% didn’t care.

On my own Facebook profile I defended the changes which resulted in a storm of commentary on the subject.

It’s clearly a hot topic for many.  This is my view:

We live in a world of constant change.  In our past major changes took hundreds of years (1750-1950) then changes would take around 10 years (1950-2000).  As technology began to drive our planet faster so the changes were faster.  From 2000 the world changed every 3 years or so.  From 2010 it seems change is radical, immediate and constant. One consequence is consumers and users want what they want instantly.  If a web page takes more than 4 seconds to load we’ve already moved on.

Therefore any business model must include rapid evolution and change.

This is all the more important with a brand as large as Facebook. Dominance is never assured.  Netscape was the biggest name is internet browsers in the late 90s.  Who even remembers them today?  Napster was the great evolution of online music at the start of the century.  Gone and forgotten.  Myspace was the first major social network and seemed to have such dominance that Newscorp bought them for $580 million even though it made pretty much no money.  Myspace is now a footnote in the history of social networks.  A history that is less than 10 years old.

In order to avoid becoming a phase in history by 2015 Facebook has to evolve with changing attitudes and habits of its key product, users. Being socially connected online was pretty novel in 2004, revolutionary perhaps. How does Facebook remain revolutionary 7 years later when we’ve all gotten over the novelty? It evolves and changes with a vision of how human communication and interaction will develop in the years to come.

Some of this change will probably not work and have to change yet again.  Other changes will be revolutionary and will lead to even greater innovations -innovations we cannot even fathom with available technology.  Just 10 years ago technology like the iPad seemed fantastical.  Today we hardly stop to think of the powerful technology we have in such a device.

It is a natural human instinct to resist change and have our comforts challenged.  But we are moving forward at a rate unprecedented in the relatively brief period of human history and to be secure in our place in modern civilization we must overcome this instinctive resistance and move to embrace this constant change.

And, as always happens, in a month we’ll be Facebooking like crazy and wonder what all the fuss was about because, hey this stuff is amazing.